How neuroscience and artificial intelligence can constrain one another
Summary
We use artificial neural networks as explicit, testable hypotheses about biological vision, and we use their failures to identify principles that may improve both neuroscience and AI. Our multi-scale model of mouse primary visual cortex integrates structural and physiological measurements, our work aligning in vitro, in vivo, and in silico cell classes tests whether models preserve meaningful biological organization, and our benchmark of unsupervised learning algorithms against human learning evaluates models beyond static task accuracy. We now ask which objectives and architectures produce brain-like selectivity and invariance, whether predictions generalize across animals, stimuli, and states, and which biological principles improve continual learning, efficiency, and interpretability in AI systems.
From the lab
Related publications from our group
Mapping neuronal selectivity and invariance in the mammalian visual cortex using digital twins
Positions digital twins as experimental partners for discovering visual response structure.
Associations between in vitro, in vivo and in silico cell classes in mouse primary visual cortex
Aligns biological and simulated cell classes across complementary measurement domains.
How Well Do Unsupervised Learning Algorithms Model Human Real-time and Life-long Learning?
Evaluates artificial learning systems against human real-time and lifelong learning behavior.
Systematic Integration of Structural and Functional Data into Multi-Scale Models of Mouse Primary Visual Cortex
Builds a biologically constrained network model from structural and physiological measurements.